MakarovSuites
English
EnglishDeutschРусскийУкраїнськаFrançaisEspañolItalianoPolski
Contact & licences

Engineering

Wall-climbing robot

Send a window-cleaning robot up the glass facade of an office tower at bright noon, high above the city: two impellers evacuate its chambers until each fan curve meets the leakage under the skirt at a closed-form 2.7 kPa, and the suction presses its wheels to the glass. It holds while mu ΔP A outweighs its weight, and it does not peel while the moment of the suction about the lower wheels beats the overturning moment of its weight. Watch the pressure dip each time a lip slides over a silicone joint: with sound joints it climbs on, with open ones the wheels slip and it stops at the closed-form stall point. Load the water tank until the motors crawl, switch off a chamber or send a gust, and the rope grab on the safety line catches it; the work of the motors is followed into height, lip drag, slip and the rope.

Wall-climbing robot — Actual application image
Actual application image

What happens

A 9 kg robot with a 3 kg water tank climbs a glass facade. Two round chambers of 0.15 m radius (A = 0.0707 m², 4.2 L each) sit 0.15 m and 0.55 m above the lower axle of a 0.7 m wheelbase. Each impeller follows Q = Q0 sqrt(1 − ΔP/P0) with P0 = 4 kPa and Q0 = 20 L/s at full speed (P0 ∝ s², Q0 ∝ s); the air leaks in under the skirt as C_d L g sqrt(2ΔP/ρ) through a 0.3 mm gap on clean glass, so the chamber settles at ΔP = Q0²/(K² + Q0²/P0) = 2.70 kPa, relaxing as dΔP/dt = γ p_a/V (Q_fan − Q_leak), integrated with RK4. Where the lip rests on a 50 mm silicone joint the gap widens by the joint gap over (asin b − asin a)/π of the perimeter, up to 27 %: at 1.5 mm the pressure dips to 1.10 kPa. The wheels on wet glass (μ = 0.5) carry μ(ΣΔP A − W); the robot holds while that exceeds M g and does not peel while the top wheels stay loaded, ΣΔP A l_i > g Σ m h + W L/2 about the lower axle. Four geared motors give 240 N at stall falling to zero at 0.4 m/s; a speed controller drives them up to that line and the traction, the wet lip drags 0.006 s × ΣΔP L v. A gust pulls outward with a sin² profile over 4 s. A rope grab locks when the robot slides faster than 0.3 m/s; peeling hangs it on the safety line. Steps of 0.5 ms; the motors’ work is followed into height, lip drag, slip heat, the rope’s arrest and kinetic energy. The city below is a 1:20 model 18 m down.

Try this

Climb to 8 m and watch each chamber’s pressure dip at the joints; open the joints to 4 mm and see it stall at the closed-form point; load the tank until the motors crawl; switch off a chamber or blow a gust above the critical pull and the rope grab catches it.

The model and its limits

Quasi-uniform gaps under rigid skirts, an orifice law for the leakage, Coulomb wheels with one friction coefficient, a quasi-static moment balance without inertia, a rope that arrests instantly. Not a certified safety calculation of real rope-access or facade equipment.

Equations used in the module
Equations
Q_fan = s·Q0·√(1 − ΔP/(s²·P0)),  Q_leak = C_d·L·g·√(2ΔP/ρ),  g = g0 + g_j·(asin b − asin a)/π
dΔP/dt = γ·p_a/V·(Q_fan − Q_leak),  ΔP* = Q0²/(K² + Q0²/P0),  K = C_d·L·g·√(2/ρ)
hold: μ·(ΣΔP·A − W) ≥ M·g,  no peel: Σ ΔP·A·l_i > g·Σ m·h + W·L/2
M·a = min(F_m(v), μN) − M·g − c·ΣΔP·L·v,  W_motor = ΔE_p + W_lip + W_slip + E_rope + E_k

Related experiments

Back to catalogue
Soft pneumatic gripper — Actual application image

Engineering

Soft pneumatic gripper

Pick a tomato in a sunlit glasshouse with a gripper of four translucent silicone fingers. Air through the valve fills their chambers with the time constant of an RC circuit, the pressure bends every finger with constant curvature M/EI, and where a finger meets the soft fruit the contact follows Hertz: F = 4/3 E* sqrt(R) δ^1.5, with a peak pressure that must stay below the fruit’s bruise threshold. Lift, and the fruit stays only while friction and the cradling fingers carry its weight and the lift’s acceleration. Find the smallest pressure that holds, make the skin wet and watch the tomato slip, then try a strawberry the same pressure bruises; every joule the air does is followed into the bent silicone, the dents and the losses.

Snake robot — Actual application image

Engineering

Snake robot

At dusk, in front of a collapsed building, a rescue team tests its snake robot on a taped field of raked dust: eight orange links on passive wheels, each joint driven along the serpenoid gait alpha sin(omega t + i beta) + gamma. Nothing pushes the robot forward but the ground - the wheels let a link slide along itself ten times more easily than across - and its translation and turning come out of the force and torque balance of the whole chain. Watch it crawl at the averaged speed the massless chain predicts, make the friction equal along and across and see it wriggle on the spot, set a small amplitude and meet the second-order closed form, offset the joints and follow it round a circle close to the ideal track. Every joule the joint motors put in reappears as heat in the dust.

Load-assist exoskeleton — Actual application image

Engineering

Load-assist exoskeleton

Lift a box off a pallet in a bright warehouse and see where the load goes. A planar mannequin - shank, thigh, pelvis, trunk, arms - follows a smooth minimum-jerk lift, and inverse dynamics gives the moment every joint must carry; at rest it is exactly the static moment of the body and box beyond the joint. The exoskeleton is a torque pair between trunk and thighs: a passive spring hands back exactly the energy it stored in the bend, an active drive takes a share of the lumbar moment, up to its torque limit and a delay late. Compare no exoskeleton, passive and active on the board, a stoop against a squat, a near box against a far one: watch the lumbar moment, the L5/S1 compression estimate, the squared-moment effort and the centre of pressure under the feet, while the human’s and the exoskeleton’s work add up exactly to the energy of body and box.