MakarovSuites
English
EnglishDeutschРусскийУкраїнськаFrançaisEspañolItalianoPolski
Contact & licences

Math

Curvature and parallel transport

Carry an arrow around a loop without ever turning it, and it comes back turned. The angle is the curvature the loop enclosed - Gauss–Bonnet - and it is why a Foucault pendulum knows its latitude. Circles of latitude, geodesic triangles, a plane and a saddle, each with its closed form beside the measured turn.

Curvature and parallel transport — Actual application image
Actual application image

What happens

Slide an arrow along a curve without ever turning it within the surface: that is parallel transport, and it is one rule - move, then lay the arrow back flat on the surface. On a flat sheet it comes back exactly as it left. On a sphere it does not. The angle it has turned through is the holonomy, and Gauss–Bonnet says it equals the curvature the loop enclosed: for a circle of latitude φ, 2π(1 − sin φ), which is the area of the cap it surrounds on the unit sphere. Watch the arrow travel: it leaves a copy of itself every few degrees, and when it comes home it sits beside a pale ghost of how it set out. The pink arc between them is the number. A geodesic - a great circle - is a curve that does not turn, so along one the arrow keeps a constant angle to the path, and a geodesic triangle turns it by exactly its angle excess: the octant with three right angles gives π/2, three names for one number. The saddle bends the other way, its curvature is negative, and the same procedure brings the arrow back turned the opposite way; the plane has nothing to enclose and turns it by nothing, at any size. The number is measured twice from the same arrow: against the frame it started in, which can only see the turn modulo 2π, and against the direction of travel, which keeps count - so the equator, which turns the arrow by a full circle, reads 2π rather than nothing. The two agree to fourteen digits. The transport is first order, the error halving with every doubling of the step, so the measured turn misses the closed form by a few parts in ten thousand and that is discretisation, not a defect. The same formula hangs in the Pantheon: a Foucault pendulum at latitude φ turns through 2π·sin φ in a sidereal day, and 2π(1 − sin φ) - the holonomy - is what is left over.

Equations used in the module
Equations
transport:  step along the curve, then project the arrow back into the tangent plane and renormalise - no rotation is ever applied
Gauss–Bonnet:  holonomy = ∫K dA over the region on the left of the loop;  ∫κ_g ds + Σ exterior angles = 2π − ∫K dA
circle of latitude φ:  2π(1 − sin φ), the cap's area on the unit sphere;  the equator turns the arrow by a full 2π
geodesic triangle:  excess E = 2·atan2(a·(b×c), 1 + a·b + b·c + c·a) = area;  the octant with three right angles gives π/2
saddle z = (x² − y²)/2:  K = −1/(1 + ρ²)², dA = √(1 + ρ²) ρ dρ dθ, so a circle of radius r encloses −2π(1 − 1/√(1 + r²))
plane:  K = 0, holonomy 0 for every loop
unwrapped:  ±2π (the path's own turn) + Σ Δ(angle of the arrow to the path);  agrees with the frame reading modulo 2π to 1e-14
convergence:  first order - error 8.22e-4 / 4.12e-4 / 2.06e-4 / 1.03e-4 / 5.16e-5 at 1250 / 2500 / 5000 / 10000 / 20000 steps, ratio 2.00
Foucault:  2π·sin φ per sidereal day;  2π·sin φ + 2π(1 − sin φ) = 2π;  Pantheon 48.87°: 31.8 h per turn
measured (20 000 steps):  45°: 1.840354 against 1.840302;  saddle r = 1: −1.840354 against −1.840302;  octant: 1.570796327 exactly

Related experiments

Back to catalogue
Gimbal lock and quaternions — Actual application image

Math

Gimbal lock and quaternions

Three nested rings hold a platform: yaw, pitch, roll. Tip the middle ring to 90 degrees and the outer and inner rings line up - two rings, one axis, a degree of freedom gone. The readings flip by half a turn while the platform barely moves; the quaternion for the same motion never notices. Apollo flew with three rings and a red zone on the ball.

The primes from the zeros of zeta — Actual application image

Math

The primes from the zeros of zeta

Riemann's explicit formula: the prime staircase is a sum of waves, one per zero of the zeta function. Add the zeros one at a time and watch a straight line ripple into the primes, each step at a prime power and ln p tall. The critical line underneath, the first 120 zeros as data, the residual against the sieve measured per zero.

The derivative under a microscope — Actual application image

Math

The derivative under a microscope

Zoom in on a smooth curve with the vertical scale locked to the horizontal one and it straightens: that is what a derivative is, and the secant through two points walks onto the tangent as they close. Then the same lens on a corner, a cusp and a curve whose difference quotient settles on nothing - three different failures, drawn as two tangents, a vertical one and none. And the part nobody is told: in floating point a smaller step stops helping near 1e-8 and then makes the answer worse, because subtracting two nearly equal numbers throws away the digits that carried the answer.