MakarovSuites
English
EnglishDeutschРусскийУкраїнськаFrançaisEspañolItalianoPolski
Contact & licences

Math

Slicing a surface

Cut a surface with a vertical plane and you get a curve; its slope is the derivative in that direction. Turn the plane and watch the slope change, then plot it in polar coordinates: for a differentiable surface that plot is exactly a circle with the gradient as its diameter, so the gradient being the steepest way up stops being a claim and becomes a picture. And one surface here has both partial derivatives, a directional derivative in every direction, and no tangent plane at all - the formula ∇f·u predicts zero while the surface climbs at 0.385, because existing is a weaker thing than differentiable.

Slicing a surface — Actual application image
Actual application image

What happens

Hold y still, walk along x, and a surface becomes a curve with an ordinary slope: that is a partial derivative, and there is one for each direction you refuse to move in. Walk in any other direction and the slope is the directional derivative; on a smooth surface it is the gradient dotted with the direction - but the formula carries two conditions. The direction must be a unit vector, and the surface must be differentiable, which is more than having partials: a cone has a directional derivative in every direction at its tip and the formula is wrong for all but two. Turn the direction, watch the slice and its slope, then try the cone.

Equations used in the module
Equations
f_x, f_y: slopes of the two axis-aligned slices
D_u f = lim (f(p + tu) − f(p))/t along unit u
D_u f = ∇f · u  - only for unit u and only where f is differentiable
the cone f = xy/√(x² + y²): every D_u exists at 0, the formula fails

Related experiments

Back to catalogue
How far a Taylor polynomial reaches — Actual application image

Math

How far a Taylor polynomial reaches

Near its centre a Taylor polynomial is indistinguishable from the function, and adding a term always pays. Away from it, three different things go wrong: outside the radius of convergence more terms make the answer worse without limit; exp(−1/x²) has a series that converges everywhere and equals the function at one point; and even inside the radius, summing far from the centre can throw away every digit. The radius itself is the distance to a singularity that is not on the real line at all, so a third scene draws the complex plane, where the answer actually lives.

Pythagoras by area — Actual application image

Math

Pythagoras by area

Three ways to compare areas: wooden pieces, flexible sheets, and an exact top view.

Conic sections — Actual application image

Math

Conic sections

Drag the gold β handle to tilt the plane. Try each preset, then switch on the Dandelin spheres. Right drag rotates; the wheel zooms. The right view uses true distances in the cutting plane. The moving point measures the focus/directrix ratio e. A circle has e = 0 and no finite directrix. q describes the horizontal projection.